Albert Einstein:Whether the chicken crossed the road or the roadcrossed the chicken depends upon your frame of reference.
Aristotle:
To actualize its potential.
Karl Marx:
It was a historical inevitability.
Carl Jung:
The confluence of events in the cultural gestalt necessitated that individual chickens cross roads at this historical juncture, and therefore synchronicitously brought such occurrences into being.
Jacques Derrida:
Any number of contending discourses may be discoveredwithin the act of the chicken crossing the road, and eachinterpretation is equally valid as the authorial intent can never be discerned, because structuralism is DEAD.
Machiavelli:
So that its subjects will view it with admiration, as achicken which has the daring and courage to boldly cross the road,but also with fear, for whom among them has the strength to contendwith such a paragon of avian virtue? In such a manner is the princely chicken's dominion maintained.
The reason for posting this here is to guage the understanding of the basic differences we as human being have' Why do we think over things that in reality donot matters. Why is it that there have to be a counter argument necessary for every thought... Reasons are not necessary, learning not to think absolutely recommended.
3 comments:
A counter argument is necessary to let the other person know about your point of you. I'm not saying it has be given religiously everytime but most of the time, you are left with no other choice.
Too much of anything usually has negative consequences so does thinking. I know someone who said, 'Don't try to understand everything in life...somethings will never make sense"..
Cheers:)
Agreed :)
Bill Gates Says: I have just release the new Chicken Office 2000, which will not only croos the roads, but will lays eggs, file your important documents, balance your checkbook and eat your neighbours.
Post a Comment